On 2/11/2018 10:14 PM, Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder
Post by Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ð¶ç¬On Sun, 11 Feb 2018 22:02:20 -0700, LO AND BEHOLD;
was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with
Post by J***@citizensauxiliarypolice.comPost by benjPost by unknownOn Tue, 30 Jan 2018 16:09:06 -0500, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq."
Warmingtards, such as kensi and Nads, have shot themselves in the foot
with their dire warnings about ice melting. Mr. Trump has heeded their
dire warnings so he is building up I.C.E. and turning them loose to
round up illegal aliens and boot their criminal asses out of the
country. So there will be no global warming in the USA thanks to our
Esteemed Leader. The temperature will be kept low by lots of I.C.E.
enforcement. Making America Great Again, the Donald is.
Take a glass with lots of ice in it, add water to the rim. When the ice
melts does the glass overflow? The water level actually goes down! Trump
is getting the job done!
Actually it depends upon how you filled the glass with ice. But hey,
Libs and greens don't do quantity or pay attention to tiny details. For
them it's all about the BIG PICTURE of saving the world. You can work
out the details yourself. Differentiating between land supported ice
and floating ice is beyond their job description. (and IQ)
Even better they're arguing temperature and completely ignoring
enthalpy! Temperature is not sufficient to measure energy.
why does it seem like the only people "arguing" about what science is saying are flat-earther-esque morons who seem to exist solely as anon mouthpieces for the slowly dying hydrocarbon energy economy?
Why is it you're a fucking lying moron?
http://ossfoundation.us/projects/environment/global-warming/myths/31000-scientists-say-no-convincing-evidence
31,000 scientists say "no convincing evidence".
31,000 scientists reject global warming and say "no convincing evidence"
that humans can or will cause global warming? But polls show that of
scientists working in the field of climate science, and publishing
papers on the topic: 97% of the climate scientists surveyed believe
“global average temperatures have increased” during the past century;
and 97% think human activity is a significant contributing factor in
changing mean global temperatures. What is the significance of these
statistics?
31,000 scientists say "no convincing evidence".
Scientific Consensus on Global Warming
While polls of scientists actively working in the filed of climate
science indicate strong general agreement that Earth is warming and
human activity is a significant factor, 31,000 scientists say there is
"no convincing evidence" that humans can or will cause "catastrophic"
heating of the atmosphere.
https://www.nas.org/articles/Estimated_40_Percent_of_Scientists_Doubt_Manmade_Global_Warming
PRINCETON, NJ (January 3, 2011)—S. Fred Singer said in an interview with
the National Association of Scholars (NAS) that “the number of skeptical
qualified scientists has been growing steadily; I would guess it is
about 40% now.”
Singer, a leading scientific skeptic of anthropocentric global warming
(AGW), is an atmospheric physicist, and founder of the Science and
Environmental Policy Project (SEPP), an organization that began
challenging the published findings of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change (IPCC) in the 1990s. SEPP established the Leipzig
Declaration, a statement of dissent from the 1997 Kyoto Protocol that
has been signed by over one hundred scientists and meteorologists.
Asked what he would like to see happen in regard to public opinion and
policy on climate change, Singer replied,
I would like to see the public look upon global warming as just another
scientific controversy and oppose any public policies until the major
issues are settled, such as the cause. If mostly natural, as NIPCC
concludes, then the public policies currently discussed are pointless,
hugely expensive, and wasteful of resources that could better be applied
to real societal problems.
NIPCC is the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change,
another group established by Singer. In 2009 NIPCC published Climate
Change Reconsidered,an 880-page report on scientific research that
contradicts the models of man-made global warming. Singer believes that
global warming exists but that human contributions to it are minimal. In
the interview Singer said he believed his efforts in the last twenty
years had been successful in disproving the notion that “the science is
settled.”
Singer continues his work in the sciences, focusing lately on
geophysical research and the Earth’s atmosphere. He is professor
emeritus of environmental science at the University of Virginia, and he
was the founding Dean of the School of Environmental and Planetary
Sciences at the University of Miami (1964-1967) and the Director of the
Center for Atmospheric and Space Physics University of Maryland (1953-1962).